Nursing Home News 2026August21

Kierstin Reed • August 20, 2026

New MDS Training from CMS: Section K Assessment and Coding Essentials.


The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is offering a web-based training that provides an overview of Section K of the Minimum Data Set (MDS). The course reviews the purpose, assessment steps, coding instructions, coding tips, key definitions, and calculation methods for accurately assessing and coding Section K items. This training can be accessed through the SNF QRP Training webpage.

 


PBJ Reporting Due August 14; Last Submission to QIES


Nursing homes must submit Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data for Fiscal Year 2026 Quarter 3 by August 14. As noted in a July 14 memo from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Fiscal Quarter 3 will be the last quarter for which nursing homes submit PBJ data through QIES. Beginning on August 17, 2026 for Fiscal Quarter 4, nursing homes will submit all data through iQIES. Remember that no data submitted after the August 14 reporting deadline will be accepted for calculating quality measures for the Five Star Quality Rating System and the Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) Quality Reporting Program (QRP). Nursing homes should submit in advance of the August 14 deadline and run applicable reports through QIES/CASPER to ensure that data has been received and appears as the nursing home expects. CMS memo QSO-26-12-NH provides information on how these reports will be run in iQIES following the August 17 transition. 

 


LeadingAge Underscores the Risk of MAO Dominance to GAO.

 


LeadingAge requested an August 17 meeting with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to inform its current work gathering information for a 2027 Medicare Advantage report requested by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Mark Warner (D-VA), and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Our goal was to ensure that skilled nursing facility (SNF) and home health agency (HHA) providers’ challenges, related to contracting with Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs), are understood through not only the lens of our members’ financial viability but also the risk MA and managed care dominance could pose to Medicare beneficiary access to care and services. The GAO report will examine CMS oversight of Medicare Advantage (MA) provider network adequacy requirements, including how beneficiaries are informed of significant network changes and alternative care options; current network adequacy exception requests and approvals; and factors influencing provider participation in MA networks. In response to GAO’s questions, LeadingAge shared member feedback about their interest and sometimes frustration in contracting with MA plans to be in network, how contract negotiations really work (e.g. MAOs often have all the leverage to dictate terms), and how frequently providers are dropped from networks or choose to terminate an MA plan contract and the reasons for those decisions. We also took the opportunity to highlight concerns and make recommendations related to monitoring and addressing the negative effects of MA plan market dominance and its impact on providers’ ability to secure adequate reimbursement. We emphasized the direct connection between beneficiary access to care and provider payment adequacy under MA. Specifically, we explained the reality that contracting with an MAO brings significant administrative burden — prior authorizations, payment claw backs, appeals — increasing providers’ costs, while MAO contracts pay those same providers less than traditional Medicare. GAO staff were particularly interested in the challenges SNFs and HHAs face in providing quality care to MA enrollees. We described delays in patient admissions caused by initial prior authorization requirements, as well as the need for subsequent approvals to support the person's recovery and condition maintenance. We noted how costs of care are being shifted from MA plans to providers and MA enrollees when care is prematurely terminated or provider networks are inaccurate resulting in no available in-network provider. We also discussed the financial and health consequences of delayed care and the cycle of authorizations, terminations, and appeals experienced by older adults enrolled in MA. Finally, we noted that current law limits CMS’s oversight role in ensuring MA plan networks include high-quality providers and that provider payments are sufficient to maintain access to care. GAO guaranteed our feedback will remain anonymous but will be incorporated into its early 2027 report. Reports from nonpartisan agencies such as GAO can help build support for future policy changes.



Nursing Home Network, August 25.


The Nursing Home Network will meet next Tuesday,  August 25 at 2 p.m. ET. We will review nursing home policy updates from the past month and discuss various questions posed by network members. The Nursing Home Network is open to all LeadingAge members and you can register for these calls here.




Medicare Part A Cost Report Overpayment Default Recoupment Date Extended.


The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced in an August 7 MLNMatters newsletter that they are extending the Healthcare Integrated General Ledger Accounting System default recoupment date for Past A cost report overpayments from 16 to 41 calendar days after the demand date. This change will take effect January 4, 2027 and affects home health agencies, hospices, and skilled nursing facilities, among other providers billing Medicare Part A. CMS states that this change aligns with default recoupment dates for Medicare Part B overpayments. For Part A cost report overpayments that are not paid in full by day 40, recoupment will begin on day 41 unless the overpayment falls into an excluded category. For more information, refer to MM14457 or contact your Medicare Administrative Contractor.



Nursing Home Risk-Based Survey Resources Now Avaliable. 


The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released survey resources on August 13 for the new Risk-Based Survey that will be rolling out for nursing homes nationwide beginning in September. Available on the Nursing Homes page of the CMS website in the Downloads section, the survey resources include the typically-available resources used by state survey agencies during standard recertification surveys, adapted for use on the Risk-Based Survey. Training videos will also be available on the Quality, Safety and Education Portal (QSEP) in the future but are not available yet. The Risk-Based Survey is an exciting step forward in survey and certification reform and we appreciate CMS continuing to make survey resources publicly available. Reviewing these resources will help nursing homes know what to expect from surveys utilizing this new survey model. Recall, however, that CMS estimates approximately 12% of nursing homes will qualify for a Risk-Based Survey and not all qualified nursing homes will receive this survey model. For this reason, nursing homes should continue to refer to the standard recertification survey resources and the State Operations Manual (Chapter 7 and Appendix PP) to assist with compliance and survey preparation activities.



Feedback requested: Dialysis and SNF Patients.


In the Calendar Year 2027 End-Stage Renal Disease proposed payment rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) included a Request for Information related to supporting patients on home dialysis during transitions of care. Specifically, they note that “patients often discontinue home dialysis following hospitalization or skilled nursing facility (SNF) admission.” CMS requests feedback on the following:

 

  • What policies would encourage continued use of PD in SNFs when clinically appropriate?
  • Whether CMS should consider payment adjustments or demonstrations to incentivize SNFs to support home dialysis modalities.
  • What additional health and safety requirements should be considered for ESRD facilities or nursing facilities to support continuity of modalities and ensure the safe delivery of home dialysis in this setting?
  • What recommendations would improve the transition of dialysis patients between different care settings (hospital, institutional, and home)?
  • Are ESRD facilities receiving electronic admission, transfer, and discharge notices as patients transition through hospitals so that they can monitor and track their patients? If not, why?

 

Based on this line of questioning, it appears CMS may be considering a few different strategies, including financial incentives and additional regulatory requirements for SNFs. Any thoughts? Please share with Jodi Eyigor jeyigor@leadingage.org by Thursday, August 20.

Here is your NATIONAL Nursing Home Weekly Recap

By Kierstin Reed • October 1, 2026
HUD Report Highlights BABA Implementation, Monitoring Issues. On September 10, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a report by its own oversight entity, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), evaluating the agency’s implementation of Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirements throughout HUD programs. The Buy America Preference within BABA requires federal agencies to limit federal infrastructure spending unless the iron, steel, manufactured, and construction products used were domestically sourced in the U.S., which has proven infeasible for LeadingAge members developing new affordable housing units. The report, titled “HUD Needs to Improve its Monitoring of the Buy America Preference of the Build America, Buy America Act,” called out HUD’s lack of compliance monitoring for BABA; OIG recommends that HUD designate an official responsible for overseeing BABA implementation and consistency across HUD program offices. BABA is applicable to four HUD program offices, including the Office of Multifamily Housing Programs, which administers the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program, as well as the Green and Resilient Retrofit Program (GRRP), both of which are subject to BABA requirements. LeadingAge continues to urge HUD and Congress to fully exempt affordable housing developments from the Buy America requirements because they are too difficult to execute and the original statute did not intend to BABA requirements to affordable housing. HUD Publishes LeadingAge-Driven Flexibilities on Emergency Call Systems. On September 10, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published new guidance, driven by concerns shared by LeadingAge, to create more flexibility within emergency notifications system requirements for affordable senior housing providers. Previously, the agency required owners of certain HUD-assisted senior housing communities to operate emergency call systems in independent living units, which could be used by residents to call for aid in the case of an emergency, like a fall or a medical event. However, LeadingAge members consistently reported issues with the call systems, including residents misusing the systems and property insurance providers limiting whole-building coverage because of the perceived liability risk associated with the medical nature of the emergency notification devices and systems. Further, many residents reported to housing providers that they prefer to utilize personally-worn emergency devices and view the property call system as overreach by housing providers. In its new guidance, HUD makes the systems optional and encourages owners to conduct wellness checks instead, which many LeadingAge affordable housing providers already do. LeadingAge confirmed with HUD that the removal of the now optional emergency notification systems is a project-eligible expense. We applaud HUD for addressing the concerns of senior housing communities, and we will work with our membership to ensure the highest quality of housing for HUD-assisted residents. Here is your weekly Affordable Housing Weekly Recap.
By Kierstin Reed • October 1, 2026
LeadingAge and Hospice Advocates Meet with OMB and DEA on Final Teleprescribing Rule
By Kierstin Reed • October 1, 2026
Federal District Court Vacates Multiple Provisions of HHS' Section 504 Rule Relating to the Integration Mandate
By Kierstin Reed • October 1, 2026
Coalition Partners to Host Webinar on El Salvador TPS. As many LeadingAge members know firsthand, the future of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is creating significant uncertainty for employees, employers, and communities across the country. Two LeadingAge coalition partners – WorkPermits.US and the American Business Immigration Coalition (ABIC) – will host a virtual webinar on Thursday, September 17 at 3p ET that will provide U.S. employers with critical updates regarding the status of work authorization for Salvadoran employees with TPS. As of September 9th, El Salvador TPS is still in place , pending the government's decision on whether to extend the program. Nonetheless, for employers, changes to TPS can have real consequences for workforce stability, employee retention, recruitment, and business operations. It is important for employers to understand what these changes mean, what responsibilities they have, and how they can support their employees with TPS. During the virtual webinar, expert panelists will cover compliance responsibilities, employer legal obligations, and actionable advocacy steps to protect essential workers. Register here if interested in this topic, and as always, reach out to Associate Director for Immigration Advancement Shane Myers if you have questions or concerns. Here is your weekly Workforce Weekly Recap
By Kierstin Reed • October 1, 2026
ICAP Respiratory Guidance Updates
By Kierstin Reed • October 1, 2026
LeadingAge Assisted Living Study Underway Participation is officially open for the 2026-2027 Assisted Living Salary & Benefits Study . Now in its 29th consecutive year, the national survey is conducted by HCS in cooperation with LeadingAge . Below is a brief overview on the study: Submission Deadline : November 9th Report Publication : January 2027 LeadingAge Participant Pricing: $190 (pre-paid) / $210 (billed) vs. $400 non-participant rate Questionnaire Download : www.hhcsinc.com Below is a full press release with survey links to share with members. Kindly confirm receipt. Thank you! 2026 HCS Assisted Living Salary & Benefits Study Underway Hospital & Healthcare Compensation Service (HCS) is conducting its annual Assisted Living Salary & Benefits Study and requests your participation. Assisted Living/Personal Care/Residential Care providers are invited to complete and submit the study questionnaire by November 9th. The national study is published by HCS in cooperation with LeadingAge . There is no cost to participate. Survey respondents receive a substantial discount, with options to purchase the final results for $190 (pre-paid) or $210 (billed), compared to the $400 non-participant rate. Questionnaires are available for download on the HCS website at: www.hhcsinc.com . The results will be published in January 2027. Last year’s Report contained data from 1,057 communities nationwide. The results cover salaries, bonuses, and hourly rates for 50 positions, with data reported regionally by bed-size, profit type, and revenue, as well as by state and CBSA. The report also covers 18 fringe benefits, including health/dental/vision insurance, PTO/time-off policies, 401(k) plans, and educational assistance, while also covering critical metrics like turnover rates, granted/budgeted salary increases, shift differentials, and sign-on bonuses. If you should have any questions, or find you need additional time beyond 11/9 to submit your data, please contact Rich Cioffe at rjcioffe@hhcsinc.com , (201) 405-0075, ext. 10. HCS publishes ten annual compensation studies. Nationally known, their reports are recognized as the standard for reliable, comprehensive, and affordable compensation data for healthcare. Thank you for your continued support! Here is your Life Plan Community Weekly Recap .
By Kierstin Reed • October 1, 2026
PBJ Submissions- CMS Releases “Non submitter list” CMS reached out last week with a list of nursing homes that have not yet registered to submit PBJ data through iQIES. We are pleased to report there are NO LeadingAge Nebraska Nursing Homes on this list. On August 17, all PBJ submissions transitioned to iQIES and FY 2026 Quarter 4 data, due on November 14, must be submitted through this system. Nursing homes must request access through iQIES and be approved by the Provider Security Official in order to submit data. This process can take weeks, especially if the Provider Security Official is no longer working at the nursing home and a new one must be registered. Nursing homes are encouraged to follow the steps outlined in the CMS memo MA Disenrollment of SNF Residents in the Spotlight The Center for Medicare Advocacy reports that nursing homes are disenrolling residents from their Medicare Advantage plans without their knowledge and that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have long-standing guidance that reinforces that these changes should only be initiated by the beneficiary or their authorized representatives. LeadingAge reminds members that such disenrollment actions by nursing homes can result in survey tags and investigations for fraud and abuse, while also can have wide-ranging implications for the beneficiaries. More details can be found in this LeadingAge article including links to the two CMS memos that outline what is permitted and the required steps that must be taken if nursing homes opt to assist beneficiaries and families with these decisions. CMS Updates HAI Measure to Include Claims Data. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released an update to the Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) Quality Reporting Program (QRP) measure technical specifications on September 24, re-specifying the Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) Requiring Hospitalization measure. This measure will now include Medicare Advantage (MA) encounter data in addition to the Medicare Fee-for-Service data that was already included in calculations. The measure specifications also include updates to risk adjustment based on the inclusion of this data. Read the updated specifications in the technical specification report, available in the Downloads section of the SNF QRP Measures and Technical Information page. New HUB Resource for Hospice Care in Nursing Homes. LeadingAge is incredibly excited to share our new resource to help providers better coordinate care for nursing home residents receiving hospice services, Hospice Care in Nursing Homes: A Shared Responsibility. The education resource reviews five sections, relationship and communication processes, regulation and reimbursement including regulatory co-management expectations, navigating complex scenarios, care coordination, and tools for building contracts, which were developed from a series of listening sessions with both hospice and nursing home members. LeadingAge Comments on Proposed Medicaid Provider Tax Rule On September 21, LeadingAge submitted comments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on its proposed rule , Medicaid Program; Amending the Indirect Hold Harmless Threshold of Health Care-Related Taxes. In our comments, we make the case that the proposed rule extends CMS’ obligation to implement section 71115 of 2025’s HR 1, which modifies Medicaid health care-related (provider) tax rules, beyond the statutory text in key ways. LeadingAge urges CMS to realign its rulemaking in a manner that minimizes burden and financial exposure for both providers and states. Upon release of the proposed rule, we provided this article , touching on the relevant provisions in the rule. We dig deeper and urge CMS restraint in five key areas in our comments .
By Kierstin Reed • October 1, 2026
 FRIENDS OF LEADINGAGE NEBRASKA PAC - We need your support!
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
HUD Report Highlights BABA Implementation, Monitoring Issues. On September 10, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a report by its own oversight entity, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), evaluating the agency’s implementation of Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirements throughout HUD programs. The Buy America Preference within BABA requires federal agencies to limit federal infrastructure spending unless the iron, steel, manufactured, and construction products used were domestically sourced in the U.S., which has proven infeasible for LeadingAge members developing new affordable housing units. The report, titled “HUD Needs to Improve its Monitoring of the Buy America Preference of the Build America, Buy America Act,” called out HUD’s lack of compliance monitoring for BABA; OIG recommends that HUD designate an official responsible for overseeing BABA implementation and consistency across HUD program offices. BABA is applicable to four HUD program offices, including the Office of Multifamily Housing Programs, which administers the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program, as well as the Green and Resilient Retrofit Program (GRRP), both of which are subject to BABA requirements. LeadingAge continues to urge HUD and Congress to fully exempt affordable housing developments from the Buy America requirements because they are too difficult to execute and the original statute did not intend to BABA requirements to affordable housing. HUD Publishes LeadingAge-Driven Flexibilities on Emergency Call Systems. On September 10, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published new guidance, driven by concerns shared by LeadingAge, to create more flexibility within emergency notifications system requirements for affordable senior housing providers. Previously, the agency required owners of certain HUD-assisted senior housing communities to operate emergency call systems in independent living units, which could be used by residents to call for aid in the case of an emergency, like a fall or a medical event. However, LeadingAge members consistently reported issues with the call systems, including residents misusing the systems and property insurance providers limiting whole-building coverage because of the perceived liability risk associated with the medical nature of the emergency notification devices and systems. Further, many residents reported to housing providers that they prefer to utilize personally-worn emergency devices and view the property call system as overreach by housing providers. In its new guidance, HUD makes the systems optional and encourages owners to conduct wellness checks instead, which many LeadingAge affordable housing providers already do. LeadingAge confirmed with HUD that the removal of the now optional emergency notification systems is a project-eligible expense. We applaud HUD for addressing the concerns of senior housing communities, and we will work with our membership to ensure the highest quality of housing for HUD-assisted residents. Here is your weekly Affordable Housing Weekly Recap.
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
CMS' Technical Error in Final FY27 Hospice Wage Index
Show More