Workforce News 2026June26

Kierstin Reed • June 25, 2026

Proposed Rule Would Significantly Increase Cost of U.S. Citizenship

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a proposed rule on June 23 that would significantly increase the cost of becoming a U.S. citizen and eliminate longstanding affordability options that have helped many lawful permanent residents pursue naturalization. The proposal would raise fees for the naturalization application (Form N‑400) and related filings and remove both reduced-fee options and fee waivers currently available to lower income applicants. Specifically, the proposal is to raise the cost of filing for naturalization from $760 to $1,330 for paper applications and from $710 to $1,280 for online applications. Fees associated with appealing a denied naturalization application would also increase substantially. At the same time, the rule would eliminate the reduced fee available to applicants with household incomes below 400% of the federal poverty level and end the availability of fee waivers altogether. Fee exemptions would remain in place for current and former members of the U.S. armed forces, as required by statute. DHS states that these changes are intended to align naturalization fees with the full cost of adjudicating applications, rather than relying on cross-subsidization within the immigration system. This approach marks a departure from prior policy frameworks that kept naturalization fees comparatively lower in order to encourage citizenship and promote integration.


The proposal arrives amid a broader set of policy and regulatory changes affecting immigrants’ ability to live and work in the United States. Recent actions have tightened procedural requirements for immigration filings and limited access to employment authorization documents. At the same time, policy changes affecting pathways to permanent residence—including new limitations on adjustment of status—have introduced additional uncertainty into long-term immigration processes. Taken together, these developments reflect a cumulative shift toward higher costs, increased administrative barriers, and greater complexity across multiple stages of the immigration system. For aging services providers, these changes are not abstract—they have direct implications for workforce stability. The sector relies heavily on foreign-born workers across a wide range of roles, including nursing assistants, home care aides, and other frontline caregiving positions, as well as administrative support, facilities maintenance, dining services, and housekeeping. Many of these workers are already navigating lengthy and complex pathways to permanent residence and citizenship. Additional financial barriers at the naturalization stage risk slowing or deterring that progression, particularly for workers with modest incomes. Reducing participation in the naturalization process is likely to have downstream effects on workforce retention, stability, and long-term integration.


Some LeadingAge members have developed programs to support employees through this transition and help staff pursue citizenship. These efforts—often including financial support, legal assistance, and community-based programming—reflect a broader understanding that citizenship strengthens workforce stability, deepens employee engagement, and supports long-term retention. For providers investing in these programs, increased federal costs may create additional challenges for both employees and employers seeking to maintain these pathways.


The proposed rule is open for public comment through August 24, 2026. LeadingAge is closely reviewing the proposal. Members and their residents who are interested in submitting comments are encouraged to reach out to Amanda for additional guidance.


KFF Data Reaffirms Health Care’s Reliance on Immigrants


New data from KFF show that the total number of immigrant workers in the U.S. remained relatively stable between early 2025 and spring 2026, despite significant shifts in immigration policy. Beneath that stability, however, the composition of the workforce was altered. KFF finds declines in the number of noncitizen immigrant workers alongside increases in naturalized citizens—leaving overall immigrant workforce numbers mostly unchanged. Within the health care sector, while immigrants represent about one in six workers overall, they account for 30% of direct care workers in long-term care settings, including those providing hands-on daily support to older adults. For LeadingAge members, this reaffirms what we already know: even modest shifts in immigration policy can have outsized effects on direct care staffing, given the sector’s ongoing reliance on immigrant workers.

Here is your weekly Workforce Weekly Recap

By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
HUD Report Highlights BABA Implementation, Monitoring Issues. On September 10, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a report by its own oversight entity, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), evaluating the agency’s implementation of Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirements throughout HUD programs. The Buy America Preference within BABA requires federal agencies to limit federal infrastructure spending unless the iron, steel, manufactured, and construction products used were domestically sourced in the U.S., which has proven infeasible for LeadingAge members developing new affordable housing units. The report, titled “HUD Needs to Improve its Monitoring of the Buy America Preference of the Build America, Buy America Act,” called out HUD’s lack of compliance monitoring for BABA; OIG recommends that HUD designate an official responsible for overseeing BABA implementation and consistency across HUD program offices. BABA is applicable to four HUD program offices, including the Office of Multifamily Housing Programs, which administers the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program, as well as the Green and Resilient Retrofit Program (GRRP), both of which are subject to BABA requirements. LeadingAge continues to urge HUD and Congress to fully exempt affordable housing developments from the Buy America requirements because they are too difficult to execute and the original statute did not intend to BABA requirements to affordable housing. HUD Publishes LeadingAge-Driven Flexibilities on Emergency Call Systems. On September 10, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published new guidance, driven by concerns shared by LeadingAge, to create more flexibility within emergency notifications system requirements for affordable senior housing providers. Previously, the agency required owners of certain HUD-assisted senior housing communities to operate emergency call systems in independent living units, which could be used by residents to call for aid in the case of an emergency, like a fall or a medical event. However, LeadingAge members consistently reported issues with the call systems, including residents misusing the systems and property insurance providers limiting whole-building coverage because of the perceived liability risk associated with the medical nature of the emergency notification devices and systems. Further, many residents reported to housing providers that they prefer to utilize personally-worn emergency devices and view the property call system as overreach by housing providers. In its new guidance, HUD makes the systems optional and encourages owners to conduct wellness checks instead, which many LeadingAge affordable housing providers already do. LeadingAge confirmed with HUD that the removal of the now optional emergency notification systems is a project-eligible expense. We applaud HUD for addressing the concerns of senior housing communities, and we will work with our membership to ensure the highest quality of housing for HUD-assisted residents. Here is your weekly Affordable Housing Weekly Recap.
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
CMS' Technical Error in Final FY27 Hospice Wage Index
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
LeadingAge Nebraska Testifies at LR481
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
Coalition Partners to Host Webinar on El Salvador TPS. As many LeadingAge members know firsthand, the future of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is creating significant uncertainty for employees, employers, and communities across the country. Two LeadingAge coalition partners – WorkPermits.US and the American Business Immigration Coalition (ABIC) – will host a virtual webinar on Thursday, September 17 at 3p ET that will provide U.S. employers with critical updates regarding the status of work authorization for Salvadoran employees with TPS. As of September 9th, El Salvador TPS is still in place , pending the government's decision on whether to extend the program. Nonetheless, for employers, changes to TPS can have real consequences for workforce stability, employee retention, recruitment, and business operations. It is important for employers to understand what these changes mean, what responsibilities they have, and how they can support their employees with TPS. During the virtual webinar, expert panelists will cover compliance responsibilities, employer legal obligations, and actionable advocacy steps to protect essential workers. Register here if interested in this topic, and as always, reach out to Associate Director for Immigration Advancement Shane Myers if you have questions or concerns. Here is your weekly Workforce Weekly Recap
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
CDC Releases Updated Return-to-Work Guidance
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
LeadingAge Assisted Living Study Underway Participation is officially open for the 2026-2027 Assisted Living Salary & Benefits Study . Now in its 29th consecutive year, the national survey is conducted by HCS in cooperation with LeadingAge . Below is a brief overview on the study: Submission Deadline : November 9th Report Publication : January 2027 LeadingAge Participant Pricing: $190 (pre-paid) / $210 (billed) vs. $400 non-participant rate Questionnaire Download : www.hhcsinc.com Below is a full press release with survey links to share with members. Kindly confirm receipt. Thank you! 2026 HCS Assisted Living Salary & Benefits Study Underway Hospital & Healthcare Compensation Service (HCS) is conducting its annual Assisted Living Salary & Benefits Study and requests your participation. Assisted Living/Personal Care/Residential Care providers are invited to complete and submit the study questionnaire by November 9th. The national study is published by HCS in cooperation with LeadingAge . There is no cost to participate. Survey respondents receive a substantial discount, with options to purchase the final results for $190 (pre-paid) or $210 (billed), compared to the $400 non-participant rate. Questionnaires are available for download on the HCS website at: www.hhcsinc.com . The results will be published in January 2027. Last year’s Report contained data from 1,057 communities nationwide. The results cover salaries, bonuses, and hourly rates for 50 positions, with data reported regionally by bed-size, profit type, and revenue, as well as by state and CBSA. The report also covers 18 fringe benefits, including health/dental/vision insurance, PTO/time-off policies, 401(k) plans, and educational assistance, while also covering critical metrics like turnover rates, granted/budgeted salary increases, shift differentials, and sign-on bonuses. If you should have any questions, or find you need additional time beyond 11/9 to submit your data, please contact Rich Cioffe at rjcioffe@hhcsinc.com , (201) 405-0075, ext. 10. HCS publishes ten annual compensation studies. Nationally known, their reports are recognized as the standard for reliable, comprehensive, and affordable compensation data for healthcare. Thank you for your continued support! Here is your Life Plan Community Weekly Recap .
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
Bipartisan Bill Seeks to Stop Medicare Advantage Payment Clawbacks Reps. Greg Landsman (D-OH) and Bob Onder (R-MO) introduced the bipartisan Protecting Approved Care Act, legislation aimed at preventing Medicare Advantage (MA) plans from retroactively denying or reducing payment for care that has already been approved and delivered. The bill would apply protections to prior authorizations, pre-service and concurrent determinations, and authorizations for transfers from hospitals to post-acute care settings. LeadingAge appreciates the bill’s focus on practices our nonprofit and mission-driven members increasingly encounter, including plans denying or making only partial payment for previously approved services and seeking lower payments than CMS-required assessments indicate. Providers should be able to rely on an MA plan’s approval when they furnish care in good faith rather than face burdensome appeals or legal action after services have already been delivered. LeadingAge is reviewing the legislation and its implications for members and will continue engaging with Congress on policies that ensure MA plans appropriately cover and pay for needed care. Here is the link to the recording of last week’s Joint Provider-Surveyor Training: https://vimeo.com/1226926568/a6ed3394ec?fl=tl&fe=ec&share=copy LeadingAge Nebraska Testifies at LR481 Senator Bostar held a hearing on Wednesday this week regarding LR481 with a purpose of examining the fiscal and operational issues related to the addition of long-term care services and supports to the Medicaid managed care program. LeadingAge Nebraska provided testimony that would caution the state against this implementation and would encourage them to proceed with thoughtful planning and collaboration prior to implementation. In his closing comments, Senator Bostar asked an important question, “Is it necessary?” He pointed out that the state has held off on implementing this for the long term care sector for a reason. Nebraska should examine the reason they want to implement this and the complications that could result from the implementation. LeadingAge Nebraska and our members continue to meet with MCO’s regarding this on a quarterly basis and we encourage members to participate in those meetings.
By Kierstin Reed • September 24, 2026
 FRIENDS OF LEADINGAGE NEBRASKA PAC - We need your support!
By Kierstin Reed • September 17, 2026
HUD Report Highlights BABA Implementation, Monitoring Issues. On September 10, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a report by its own oversight entity, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), evaluating the agency’s implementation of Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirements throughout HUD programs. The Buy America Preference within BABA requires federal agencies to limit federal infrastructure spending unless the iron, steel, manufactured, and construction products used were domestically sourced in the U.S., which has proven infeasible for LeadingAge members developing new affordable housing units. The report, titled “HUD Needs to Improve its Monitoring of the Buy America Preference of the Build America, Buy America Act,” called out HUD’s lack of compliance monitoring for BABA; OIG recommends that HUD designate an official responsible for overseeing BABA implementation and consistency across HUD program offices. BABA is applicable to four HUD program offices, including the Office of Multifamily Housing Programs, which administers the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program, as well as the Green and Resilient Retrofit Program (GRRP), both of which are subject to BABA requirements. LeadingAge continues to urge HUD and Congress to fully exempt affordable housing developments from the Buy America requirements because they are too difficult to execute and the original statute did not intend to BABA requirements to affordable housing. HUD Publishes LeadingAge-Driven Flexibilities on Emergency Call Systems. On September 10, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published new guidance, driven by concerns shared by LeadingAge, to create more flexibility within emergency notifications system requirements for affordable senior housing providers. Previously, the agency required owners of certain HUD-assisted senior housing communities to operate emergency call systems in independent living units, which could be used by residents to call for aid in the case of an emergency, like a fall or a medical event. However, LeadingAge members consistently reported issues with the call systems, including residents misusing the systems and property insurance providers limiting whole-building coverage because of the perceived liability risk associated with the medical nature of the emergency notification devices and systems. Further, many residents reported to housing providers that they prefer to utilize personally-worn emergency devices and view the property call system as overreach by housing providers. In its new guidance, HUD makes the systems optional and encourages owners to conduct wellness checks instead, which many LeadingAge affordable housing providers already do. LeadingAge confirmed with HUD that the removal of the now optional emergency notification systems is a project-eligible expense. We applaud HUD for addressing the concerns of senior housing communities, and we will work with our membership to ensure the highest quality of housing for HUD-assisted residents. Here is your weekly Affordable Housing Weekly Recap.
By Kierstin Reed • September 17, 2026
CMS' Technical Error in Final FY27 Hospice Wage Index
Show More